Enterprise Risk Management, Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Public Listed Companies

Saiful Husaini


The agency conflict in modern companies could be impact to firm value reducing. To solve this problem should be implemented the good  corporate governance and enterprise risk management (ERM). This study aimed to test whether the ERM implementation and corporate governance can enhance shareholder value. It uses the multiple regression analysis of 110 companies for the year 2010 to 2013. Results of this study concluded that the implementation of ERM positive effect on firm value. It means that the better implementation of ERM will be followed by increasing firm value. Furthermore, the size of the board of directors is also a positive influence on firm value it implies that the greater the number of director, the more effective supervision of the company so that the company's value will increase. This study also height the positive relationship between the independent board and firm value. It indicates that the higher the proportion of independent directors on the board of a company, the better the value of the company. Instead research shows managerial ownership negative effect on the value of the company. These results contradict the agency theory which states that one of the solutions to the agency conflicts is to increase managerial ownership.

Keywords: ERM, Board Size, Independent Board, Managerial Ownership, and Firm value.

Full Text:



Brigham EF, Gapenski IC (1996) Intermediate Financial Managememt, 5th Edition, New York: The Dryden Press.

Jensen M (1996) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers, American Economic Review 76:323-39.

Schröck G (2002) Risk Management and Value Ceation in Financial Institutions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New Jersey.

Cowan N (2004) Corporate Governance That Works. Prentice Hall Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. Singapore.

Siallagan H, Dan Machfoedz M (2006) Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Kualitas Laba, dan Nilai Perusahaan. Makalah disajikan pada SNA IX, Padang, 23-26 Agustus.

COSO (2004) Enterprise Risk Management-Intergrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. New York.

Hoyt RE, dan Liebenberg AP (2008) The Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the U.S. Insurance Industry. (http://www.ssrn.com).

Husaini dan Rafika I (2014) Corporate Governance, Enterprise Risk Management dan Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Fairness, l (4):22-35.

Tahir IM, Razali AR (2011) The Relationship Between Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Firm Value: Evidence from Malaysia Public Listed Companies. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences. 1(2):32-41.

Yermack D Higher market valuati on of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40:185-212.

Anderson RC, Mansi SA, Reeb DM (2004) Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and The Cost Of Debt, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37 (3):315-342.

Beasley MS, Clune R, dan Hermanson DR (2005) Enterprise Risk Management: An Empirical Analysis of Factors Associated with the Extent of Implementation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24:521–531.

Saiful (2011) Family Voting Rights, Board Characteristics, and Shareholder Value: The Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 14 (2): 123-141.

Black BS, Jang H, Kim W (2006) Does Corporate Governance Predict Firms' Market Values? Evidence from Korea, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22 (2):366-413.

Bhagat S, Black B (2002) The Non-correlation between Board Independence and Long-term Firm Performance, The Journal of corporation law, 27, (2):231-243.

Ho CK (2005) Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness: an international analysis, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13 (2):211-253.

Brown LD, Caylor ML (2004) Corporate Governance and Firm Performance, Working Paper (http://ssrn.com/paper=586423),

Tjager IN, Antonius FA, Humprey RD, dan Soembodo B (2003) Corporate Governance: Tantangan dan Kesempatan bagi Komunitas Bisnis Indonesia. Prenhillindo, Jakarta.

Abbott LG, Peters Raghunandan K (2003) the association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. A Journal of Practice and Theory. 19(1):31–47.

Carcello JV, Hermanson DR, Neal TL, Riley R (2002) Disclosures in Audit Committee Charters and Reports. Accounting Horizons 16 (4):291–304.

Abbott L J (2004) Audit committee characteristics and restatements, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23:69-87.

Husaini (2012) Audit Committee Characteristics and Enterprise Risk Management of Indonesia Public Listed Bank. Proceedings the 12th Malaysia Indonesia International Comference on Economics, Management, and Accounting, Unsri Palembang.

Herlin, Saiful dan Husaini (2004) Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Non Keuangan Dalam Indeks Sri-Kehati. Jurnal Fairness, 4 (3):01-10.

Al-Matari EM, Faudziah HF, Abdullah KS (2014) The Moderating Effect of Board Diversity on the Relationship Between Audit Committee Characteristics and Firm Performance in Oman: Empirical Study. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 21 (5):792-801.

Al-Mamun A, Qaiser RY, MD Ashikur R (2014) Relationship Between Audit Committee Characteristics, External Auditor and Economic Value Edded (EVA) if Public Listed Firm in Malaysia. Corporate Ownership & Control. 12 (1):899-910.

Berle A, Jr G Means (1932) the modern corporation and private property, New York: Macmillan.

Jensen M, W Meckling (1976) Theory of the firm: Management behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360.

Demsetz H (1983) the structure of ownership and the theory of the firm, Journal of Law and Economics, 26:375-390.

Hambrick DC, Jackson EM (2000) Outside Directors with a Stake: The Linchpin in Corporate Governance, California Management Review, 42 (4):108-127.

Agrawal A, Knoeber CR (1996) Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders, the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3):377-397.

Morck R, A Shleifer, Vishny RW (1988) Management ownership and market valuation. An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20:293-315.

Hermalin BE, Weisbach S (1991) The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management 20:101-112.

Sekaran U (2003) Research Methods for Business, 4th Edition. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc).

Gordon L, Loeb M, Tseng C (2009) Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance: A Contingency Perspective, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28(4):301- 327.

Gujarati DN, Porter DC (2009) Basic econometrics, Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (2010) Multivariate data analysis. 2nd Edition, New York, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.


  • There are currently no refbacks.